One of the entertaining, if very insider, side stories of the 2012 presidential elections was the [url=http://www.ci85.fr/oreille/bottes-ugg-pas-cher-femme.html]ugg[/url] that went on in the world of punditry. On one side was the traditional pundit class, accustomed to using its prophetic special sauce [url=http://www.ci85.fr/oreille/bottes-ugg-pas-cher-femme.html]ugg pas cher[/url] varying parts gut, experience, reporting and data – to inform news consumers of the state of play [url=http://www.ci85.fr/oreille/bottes-ugg-pas-cher-femme.html]ugg australia[/url] on the other side were political science nerds – “quants” for their quantitative mindset [url=http://www.ci85.fr/oreille/bottes-ugg-pas-cher-femme.html]bottes ugg[/url] who lacked years of shoe-leather campaign-coverage experience, didn’t bother with their guts and insisted that data alone could give a more accurate view of the election. [url=http://www.ci85.fr/oreille/bottes-ugg-pas-cher-femme.html]ugg soldes[/url] The old school pundits swor |