One of the entertaining, if very insider, side stories of the 2012 presidential elections was the <a href="http://www.fie.fr/">ugg pas cher</a> that went on in the world of punditry. On one side was the traditional pundit class, accustomed to using its prophetic special sauce <a href="http://www.fie.fr/">ugg australia</a> varying parts gut, experience, reporting and data – to inform news consumers of the state of play <a href="http://www.fie.fr/">bottes ugg</a>  on the other side were political science nerds – “quants” for their quantitative mindset <a href="http://www.fie.fr/">ugg soldes</a> who lacked years of shoe-leather campaign-coverage experience, didn’t bother with their guts and insisted that data alone could give a more accurate view of the election. <a href="http://www.fie.fr/">botte ugg</a> The old school pundits swore that the election was on a knife’s edge (or, hilariously, that Romney was surging to victory – <a href="http://www.fie.fr/">uggs pas cher</a> polling data be damned). T